The significance of the Obama-Castro handshake

BENJAMIN F. CHAVIS JR. | 12/24/2013, 9:40 a.m. | Updated on 12/26/2013, 4:30 p.m.
In the tradition of the Black Church in America, the right hand of fellowship handshake is extended as a sign ...
Benjamin F. Chavis Jr

(NNPA) – In the tradition of the Black Church in America, the right hand of fellowship handshake is extended as a sign of welcome into the church community. Usually, a handshake between two world leaders at a memorial service is not seen as something controversial or unprecedented. On Dec. 10, however, at the beginning of the memorial service for Nelson “Madiba” Mandela in the heart of Soweto, South Africa, the handshake between President Barack Obama and President Raul Castro Ruz of Cuba was viewed differently. It was not so much as an affront to any religious protocol, but was viewed by many as being controversial and consequential depending on political, ideological, cultural and historical perceptions or perspectives.

I have always maintained that if not reported anywhere else, it is important for the National Newspaper Publishers Association, Black Press USA, to share with its millions of readers an analysis that goes beyond the hype of the mainstream media in America on issues that are vital to the strategic economic, political and cultural interests of the African American community as well as the interests of freedom-loving people throughout the world. It is, therefore, important to look deeper into the significance of the Obama-Castro handshake for both historical and contemporary clarity.

The first issue should be the respectful acknowledgement of the tide-turning role that Cuba played in the global anti-apartheid struggle. In the 1980’s, the frontline African nations that bordered South Africa were periodically being militarily violated with the brutal violence and repression that became routine of the apartheid regime. South African military attacks directly on the African National Congress inside South Africa and in Angola, South West Africa and in other areas of southern Africa had escalated.

In fact, South Africa invaded South West Africa (now Namibia) and the Republic of Angola. President Fidel Castro Ruz urgently dispatched more than three hundred thousand Cuban soldiers to Angola over several years to help stop and to eventually defeat the South African military on the ground in Angola in 1988. By contrast, keep in mind that President Ronald Reagan from 1981 to 1989 tacitly supported apartheid South Africa and tried unsuccessfully to have a “constructive engagement” with apartheid under the guise of preventing communism in southern Africa.

I traveled to Angola in 1988 on more than one occasion to witness firsthand how Cuba was helping the Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola in Angola and the ANC as well as South West Africa People’s Organization. I visited the battleground area in the aftermath of the Battle of Cuito Cuanavale that took place during a six-month period from the end of 1987 to the spring of 1988. That battle was the largest single armed conventional warfare on African soil since World War II. I went down into the foxholes with Cubans, Angolans, Namibians and native South Africans, all fighting together heroically to liberate southern Africa from oppression, colonialism and imperialism. One of the key commanders of all the Cuban troops in southern Africa was Raul Castro Ruz, then-President Fidel Castro’s younger brother.