Quantcast
11:24 p.m., 10/25/2014 |  Sign in
67°

Obama’s one-sided responsibility lecture to Black boys

WALTER FIELDS | 3/10/2014, 7:53 a.m.

(NNPA) – Too often during his presidency, Barack Obama has felt the need to chide Blacks to take responsibility for their destiny. In announcing his new “My Brother’s Keeper” initiative targeting young men of color, he again waded into the personal responsibility waters and told the nation our Black and Latino young men simply have to do better, be better. After all, Obama shared how he was the product of a single parent, did not have a relationship with his father and was sometimes angry about that, got high and made some bad choices. But look at him now, all grown up and occupying the White House.

It’s not like we have not heard this pitch before. Most Black children receive this message whether the product of a two- or single-parent household. If you have spent any time in a Black church, chances are you have heard the sermon. And contrary to popular belief, Black people actually confront irresponsible behavior on a frequency that would shock White America. What’s different here is that the message is coming from our highest and most powerful elected official, whose reflection in the mirror looks like us.

My level of disgust for this message delivered by the president is similar to the anger I feel when I hear the generalized “you people” when a White person seeks to demonize Black people. When Obama uses such rhetoric it reinforces the perception among many Whites that if only Black people would get their act together they could make something of themselves. It reminds me of the movies I despised when I was a child, depicting mumbling and self-deprecating Black house servant who put down Blacks to curry favor with the White boss but was too ignorant to understand he was insulting himself. The crowd the president plays to with this message is predisposed to discount the value of Black people, including the one in the Oval Office.

I can’t recall a White president delivering that message to White men. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and the wigged crew from 1776 certainly looked the other way when they and their White brethren were buying and selling Africans like cattle. My father served in World War II but I don’t remember reading that President Truman publicly rebuked White male military leaders for allowing Black soldiers to bleed for their country but be treated as second-class citizens.

Perhaps I missed the kinescope of Dwight D. Eisenhower chastising White men for spitting on and cursing at little Black children who simply wanted to go to school. I do not have a memory of John F. Kennedy telling White, Southern men who bombed churches and murdered Black children to be responsible. Nor for that matter did JFK dress down Southern governors like George Wallace for being blatantly racist and trampling on the Constitution.

Who holds White, male CEOs responsible when they mismanage billion-dollar corporations, causing thousands to lose their jobs but walk away with million dollar golden parachutes as a ”reward” for their incompetence? And who holds corporations, run by predominantly White men, responsible when they hire these failures to run their enterprises, running the risk of creating more collateral damage in the form of displaced workers and devastated families? It is near impossible to get a predominantly White jury to convict a police officer who is a White male and has killed a Black male with excessive force. And I’ve never heard a president tell White college students that riot after a sporting event that they should be more responsible and stop causing property damage and injuring police.