Quantcast

Making no progress on race with ‘progressives’

JULIANNE MALVEAUX | 2/9/2015, 8:15 a.m.
like Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. Her progressive ideas are just what we need while Hilary Clinton is straddling the fence, ...

(NNPA) – I like Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. Her progressive ideas are just what we need while Hilary Clinton is straddling the fence, and still cozying up with bankers. Warren says she isn’t running for president, but there are quite a few political action committees urging her to run.

Like President Barack Obama, she released a biography (A Fighting Chance) just two years before the 2016 election. It provides details of her hardscrabble childhood, her early pregnancy and marriage, and her struggles combining work and family when she had a small child. Men and women can relate to her story, as well as at the way she became the guru for consumer rights and financial literacy. When senators would not confirm her for the permanent position in the Department of Treasury, she ran for the Senate. It was her first time running for office and she won.

Warren has consistently articulated a progressive agenda focused on those at the bottom. As progressive as she is, she has consistently ignored race matters. Perhaps this is because progressive politicians feel they will alienate part of their base if they talk about race. This makes Warren and the others not much different than conventional politicians, ignoring the economic differences between African Americans and others.

How would Warren deal with declining revenues for Historically Black Colleges and Universities? Would she step in to close the unemployment rate gap or the achievement gap? Would she deal with the housing discrimination that too many African Americans face? Or, would she hide behind the common progressive refrain that challenges at the bottom are addressed? That is: African Americans are lifted up and their circumstance will change as the plight of everyone else improves.

Another impressive senator, Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, has articulated a progressive agenda in the Senate for more than a decade. He hails from the swing state of Ohio, and many are wondering why he doesn’t command the same kind of attention that Warren does. While his ideas are solid, he, too, has pretty much ignored the issue of race.

At the same time that progressives have been ignoring race, we have been barraged with proof that race matters. Whether we are talking about those in kindergarten or in high schools, African American students face stricter discipline (with some of them, regardless of age, handcuffed and expelled from school), while teachers rely on their sociology classes to justify keeping White kids in school for the same infractions. Conversations about disproportionate rates of incarceration, and racial disparities in the application of the death penalty are rarely raised in Congress unless members of the Congressional Black Caucus bring it up.

Progressives should not talk about race matters exclusively, but they exhibit a pathetic myopia when they fail to talk about race at all.

African American Democrats will hold their noses and vote for Warren, or if they are Clinton loyalists, they will vote for her instead. Indeed, Warren has as much a chance of winning a presidential contest as I do, but her committees will challenge the Clinton positions on domestic public policy. If she is able to get Clinton to alter her positions on just a few matters, she will have done her job.