Flint, Michigan, residents mistreated because of race, class

GEORGE E. CURRY | 2/8/2016, 9:23 a.m.
Let’s face it: Contaminated water would not have flowed through the pipes of Flint, Michigan – certainly not for as ...
George Curry

(George Curry Media) – Let’s face it: Contaminated water would not have flowed through the pipes of Flint, Michigan – certainly not for as long as it did – if the residents of the city of nearly 100,000 had been White and affluent instead of Black and largely poor.

In fact, if two-term Republican Gov. Rick Snyder had dreamed of that happening in Bloomfield Hills, he would have called a press conference the next morning to apologize for having such a nightmare.

But Flint is not Bloomfield Hills.

According to 2014 Census Bureau figures, Flint is predominantly Black (56.6 percent), has a poverty rate of 41.5 percent, which is nearly three times the national figure, and a median family income of $24,834.

On the other hand, Bloomfield Hills, which is 90 percent White and only 3.2 percent African American, has a poverty rate of only 2 percent, an estimated median family income of $151,596, and the medium house or condo is valued at $670,823 – about 23 times the value of the average home ($29,000) in Flint, according to city-data.com.

Whether a family drinks or bathes in lead-contaminated water should not be determined by their race or income. Black and poor lives should matter as much as White and rich ones. Because that wasn’t the case in Flint, children were exposed to unacceptably high levels of lead poisoning, which could lead to brain damage, learning disabilities and behavioral problems.

Everyone responsible for this fiasco should lose their job, be criminally prosecuted and if found guilty, serve time in prison and pay restitution.

Fortunately, the eyes of the nation are fixed on Michigan to see if justice will prevail. The National Bar Association, under the leadership of President Benjamin L. Crump, was scheduled to hold a town hall meeting on the water crisis Monday in Flint with its local and state counterparts.

Congressional hearings were scheduled for this Wednesday and Rev. Al Sharpton was planning to bring busloads of New Yorkers to monitor the proceedings. Unfortunately, most of our civil rights leaders are doing little beyond holding press conferences and issuing statements about the crisis in Flint. With February – a/k/a “Negro Employment Month” – now upon us, they will become even more distant.

Meanwhile, we continue to learn new, sordid details about this reprehensible tragedy.

From 2011-2015, Flint was in state receivership and went through four emergency managers appointed by the governor. In April 2014, in a move to save money, the state-imposed emergency manager decided to switch Flint’s water supply from Lake Huron to the Flint River. Shortly after the change, residents began to complain about the water’s taste, color and odor. Stories were written about it in Flint and Detroit newspapers, but residents were repeatedly told they had nothing to fear. The city issued a press release saying, “Flint water is safe to drink.”

While city residents were being targeted with that message, state employees were quietly getting another one.

As the Detroit Free Press reported, “In January of 2015, when state officials were telling worried Flint residents their water was safe to drink, they also were arranging for coolers of purified water in Flint’s State Office Building so employees wouldn’t have to drink from the taps, according to state government e-mails released Thursday …”