Quantcast

Highlights from in and around the world of Texas politics

Associated Press | 6/5/2017, 1:52 p.m.
As the Texas legislative session came to a close as of Monday’s final adjournment, lawmakers worked to resolve lingering issues. ...
Sen. Jose Rodriguez, D-El Paso, center, stands with other Texas legislators and civil rights representatives during a news conference at the Texas Capitol, Monday, Jan. 9, in Austin. The group called for Gov. Greg Abbott and other legislators to protect the rights of minorities and immigrants as the Texas' 85th Legislative session begins the next day. Eric Gay

AP) – As the Texas legislative session came to a close as of Monday’s final adjournment, lawmakers worked to resolve lingering issues. The following is a look at how the laws will affect education, voting, the justice system and air space.

Voucher plan for schools

The Texas Senate voted Monday to attach a modest voucher plan to a sweeping, bipartisan school finance bill that already cleared the House – potentially dooming an effort to pump an extra $1.6 billion into classrooms and begin overhauling the troubled way the state pays for public education.

Republicans control both chambers of the Texas Legislature, but the Senate has for years advanced voucher plans seeking to offer public money to students attending private and religious schools, only to have such proposals repeatedly and resoundingly defeated in the House.

Another such showdown is likely looming, and the end result could be Texas getting neither vouchers nor important fixes to the state’s “Robin Hood” system, under which school districts in wealthy areas share local property tax revenue they collect with those in poorer parts of the state.

The original House plan sought to increase annual per-student funding about $210 to $5,350, while raising funding for school district transportation and educating dyslexic students – increasing total spending by $1.6 billion.

The version the Senate approved after midnight increases classroom funding by only about $500 million, scraps the $210 per-student increase and adds a plan offering taxpayer funds that would go into education savings accounts that some special education students could use to attend private schools.

“This is only for those situations where parents really are unhappy with what’s going on with their special-needs child,” said its sponsor, Sen. Larry Taylor, a Friendswood Republican.

Taylor said only about 6,000 students maximum would likely qualify to start. But critics note that voucher plans that begin modestly in other states often grew at break-neck speed.

“This is like the camel with its nose under the tent,” said Dallas Democratic Sen. Royce West, who called the education savings account plan “the voucher, that’s what it’s commonly referred to.”

“Call it what you will,” Taylor replied.

The House is expected to reject Senate changes. That would send the bill to conference committee, where differences will have to be reconciled before the legislative session ends next week.

House education leaders have indicated that vouchers in any form are non-starters – but the stakes are rising since the Senate’s changes may now mean fully sacrificing a major school finance bill.

Rep. Dan Huberty, a Republican from Houston who is chairman of the powerful House Public Education Committee and spent months working on the original school finance overhaul, said he was still studying what the Senate approved overnight and hadn’t fully made up his mind – but also indicated he’s far from optimistic about his proposal’s future.

“I’m not certain that we’re going home with anything,” Huberty said on the House floor late Monday afternoon.

Texas educates around 5.3 million public school students, more than any state except California, but has endured decades of legal battles, with the Legislature frequently cutting classroom budgets so deeply that school districts sue. No school finance changes are legally required this session because Texas’ Supreme Court ruled last summer that the system was flawed but minimally constitutional.