Federal regulator to reform CRA but won’t confirm discrimination
CHARLENE CROWELL | 7/8/2018, 12:56 a.m.
Center for Responsible Lending
When the Community Reinvestment Act was enacted in 1977, urban disinvestment, redlining and blockbusting were widespread across the country. Credit was also tight in rural communities where the mortgage needs of rural residents were mostly served by smaller banks. In both types of communities, little oversight paid attention to fair lending.
For communities of color, CRA was welcomed with hopes that banking and credit needs would be as fair as they were accessible. Clearly, CRA was intended to address lending discrimination aimed at individuals and businesses in low-to-moderate income communities.
Years later, when the law was amended in 1992, meeting the credit needs of all communities was added to the criteria covered in bank examinations. Investments with minority-owned financial institutions was also added and included Blacks, Latinos, Native Americans, Asian Americans and multiracial-owned banks.
Yet, when the Trump-appointed Comptroller of the Currency, Joseph Otting, testified in a House Financial Services Committee hearing June 13, he dodged questions about whether he believed discrimination exists in America. Instead, Otting responded by saying he had never personally observed discrimination but had heard about it from others.
Rapid reactions followed Otting’s comments.
“While you may be fortunate enough to have never personally witnessed discrimination, it is alarming that an individual entrusted with regulating institutions that provide critical financial services to a broad range of constituencies appears shockingly unfamiliar with the rationale behind the promulgation of specific regulations aimed to address the problem,” wrote U.S. Rep. Cedric Richmond, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus to Otting later that week.
“The CRA has done important work to drive financial equity and ensure banks serve all communities where they have a financial footprint,” noted Scott Astrada, Federal Advocacy Director with the Center for Responsible Lending. “Comptroller Otting’s proposal to radically restructure the law should be closely scrutinized because, given his remarks, he is apparently oblivious to the historic and systemic discrimination that the CRA was enacted to eliminate.”
As an independent bureau of the U.S. Treasury Department, OCC regulates and supervises all 1,300 national banks, federal savings associations and federal branches of foreign banks. An agency staff of 4,000 employees works with the Comptroller who also and concurrently serves as a director of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, member of the Financial Stability Oversight Council, and the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.
On June 21, OCC released a report on banking revenues. In just the first quarter of 2018, banks and federal savings associations reported $8.2 billion, a 62.8 percent increase – $3.2 billion larger than the last quarterly report.
Before Otting’s appointment as Comptroller, he had a lengthy career as a banker, with a series of positions with major institutions like Bank of America, Union Bank of California, and OneWest Bank, N.A.
So how could financial discrimination be so elusive to Otting? In his senior executive roles, how did he and his staff report CRA compliance?
And if he somehow missed the history of discrimination, perhaps it would be helpful for him to glean insights from an important annual report. On June 19, Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies released its annual report, The State of the Nation’s Housing 2018.