Stealing education vs. fighting for fair opportunities

STACY M. BROWN | 3/25/2019, 11:06 a.m.
Former cast member on the ABC sitcom Full House, Lori Loughlin, was taken into custody by the FBI Wednesday in ...
Tanya McDowell stands trials for multiple charges. Everipedia.org

(NNPA) – Former cast member on the ABC sitcom Full House, Lori Loughlin, was taken into custody by the FBI Wednesday in Los Angeles after she, Oscar-nominated actress Felicity Huffman and 48 others were charged in a $25 million college admissions scam that ABC News said has prompted repercussions from Hollywood to the boardrooms of major corporations.

Loughlin and Huffman are among 33 parents charged with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud in the nationwide scam to get their children into elite colleges, including Yale, Stanford, Georgetown and the University of Southern California.

Social media is abuzz over this case, and many are wondering whether anyone will spend time in jail for their crimes.

For some, it’s another example of the difference between when the White “elite” are charged with crimes compared to poor people of color. Some drew a comparison between the wealthy, celebrity families caught in the scheme and the cases of Kelley Williams-Bolar and Tanya McDowell.

In 2011, Williams-Bolar, a Black woman, was sentenced to 10 days in county jail, three years of probation and $30,000 in restitution for lying about her residency to get her daughters into a better school district in Ohio.

For McDowell, the punishment was worse.

“[McDowell] got 12 years for sending her 6-year-old son to Norwalk, Connecticut’s Brookside Elementary School while she ‘lived’ in Bridgeport, even though she was homeless,” said Bishop Talbert Swan, an activist and pastor.

“She was convicted of first-degree larceny for ‘stealing’ an education,” Swan said.

When McDowell was sentenced in 2012, she vowed to continue to fight for a better education and life for her young son.

Authorities said that her charges were compounded by the fact that she twice sold drugs to an undercover police officer. The complex case left some scratching their heads, while others who had previously supported McDowell began to step away when the drug charges surfaced.

Some observers suspected that because of the “stealing” education case, the woman was targeted and set up by authorities, including the prosecutor.

“Who would have thought that wanting a good education for my son would put me in this predicament,” McDowell, 34, said at her sentencing where she received 12 years in prison with seven years suspended.

“I have no regrets seeking a better education for him; I do regret my participation in this drug case,” she added.

Norm Pattis, a trial lawyer in Connecticut, who once said he’s fighting for freedom “one client at a time,” recently wrote a blog about the case expressing that he felt the system owed McDowell.

“I hope Tanya McDowell will forgive us, someday, for our hypocrisy and cruelty. I hope her son will as well. But first she will have to serve her prison term. Her son will have to learn to get along without her,” he stated.

Legal experts have stated that the charges faced by McDowell often go hand-in-hand with life circumstances.

“An addict has to steal, often, to support their habit,” Pattis said.

However, McDowell was no ordinary drug user, he said.